RE: covariance step

From: Atul Bhattaram Venkatesh Date: July 16, 2009 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hello You should increase the upper boundaries. Also you might try using allometric models while fixing some of the parameters, if data is limited. Atul Venkatesh Atul Bhattaram Pharmacometrics Office of Clinical Pharmacology US Food and Drug Administration "The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily reflect any position of the Government or the Food and Drug Administration."
Quoted reply history
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Varsha Mehta Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:21 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] covariance step Dear NONMEM users: I have a data set for 30 infants where I am running a 2 COMPT PK model. I got the following error message for the covariance step. I need some help with trying to fix this error. Any suggestions? should I increase the upper boundries of initial estimates? MINIMIZATION SUCCESSFUL NO. OF FUNCTION EVALUATIONS USED: 289 NO. OF SIG. DIGITS IN FINAL EST.: 3.0 0PARAMETER ESTIMATE IS NEAR ITS BOUNDARY THIS MUST BE ADDRESSED BEFORE THE COVARIANCE STEP CAN BE IMPLEMENTED any help is appreciated. Thanks Varsha Mehta, MS(CRDSA), Pharm.D., FCCP Clinical Associate Professor Pharmacy, Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases Clinical Pharmacist Neonatal Critical Care University of Michigan (O) 734-936-8985 (F) 734-936-6946 [email protected] ********************************************************** Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Jul 16, 2009 Varsha Mehta covariance step
Jul 16, 2009 Atul Bhattaram Venkatesh RE: covariance step
Jul 16, 2009 Yaming Hang RE: covariance step
Jul 17, 2009 Nick Holford Re: covariance step
Jul 20, 2009 Scott VanWart RE: covariance step