CrcL or Cr in pediatric model

From: Peter Bonate Date: January 12, 2009 technical Source: mail-archive.com
I have an interesting question I'd like to get the group's collective opinion on. I am fitting a pediatric and adult pk dataset. I have fixed weight a priori to its allometric exponents in the model. When I test serum creatinine and estimated creatinine clearance equation as covariates in the model (power function), both are statistically significant. CrCL appears to be a better predictor than serum Cr (LRT = 22.7 vs 16.7). I have an issue with using CrCL as a predictor in the model since it's estimate is based on weight and weight is already in the model. Also, there might be collinearity issues with CrCL and weight in the same model, even though they are both significant. Does anyone have a good argument for using CrCL in the model instead of serum Cr? Thanks Pete bonate Peter L. Bonate, PhD, FCP Genzyme Corporation Senior Director Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics 4545 Horizon Hill Blvd San Antonio, TX 78229 USA [email protected] phone: 210-949-8662 fax: 210-949-8219 crackberry: 210-315-2713 alea jacta est - The die is cast. Julius Caesar
Jan 12, 2009 Peter Bonate CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 12, 2009 Nick Holford Re: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 12, 2009 Jakob Ribbing RE: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 12, 2009 Leonid Gibiansky Re: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 13, 2009 Jakob Ribbing RE: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 13, 2009 Nick Holford Re: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 13, 2009 Jeffrey Barrett RE: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 13, 2009 Leonid Gibiansky Re: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 14, 2009 Jakob Ribbing RE: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model
Jan 14, 2009 Leonid Gibiansky Re: CrcL or Cr in pediatric model