NONMEM memory vs. run time

From: Leonid Gibiansky Date: September 07, 2008 technical Source: cognigen.com
Dear All, I noticed that the Nonmem installed with NMQUAL "big nm6" defaults instead of the standard ones results in approximately 10-times increase in the memory required to run Nonmem (on my recent problem, from 12 MB to 140 MB). I am wondering whether anybody checked how this influences the run time. Is it better (in terms of the run time) to use standard sizes, or "big" is OK if you have enough RAM? Thanks! Leonid -------------------------------------- Leonid Gibiansky, Ph.D. President, QuantPharm LLC web: www.quantpharm.com e-mail: LGibiansky at quantpharm.com tel: (301) 767 5566
Sep 07, 2008 Leonid Gibiansky NONMEM memory vs. run time
Sep 08, 2008 Leonid Gibiansky NONMEM memory vs. run time
Sep 08, 2008 Darin Perusich Re: NONMEM memory vs. run time
Sep 08, 2008 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: NONMEM memory vs. run time
Sep 08, 2008 Nick Holford Re: NONMEM memory vs. run time
Sep 08, 2008 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: NONMEM memory vs. run time
Sep 08, 2008 Alan Xiao RE: NONMEM memory vs. run time