RE: AUC Calculation in Simulation with and without EST

From: Mats Karlsson Date: January 07, 2008 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Paul, When using $SIM only, the AUC will be estimated based on the simulated parameter values including the ETA's. With PRED or if you do $SIM+$EST (without POSTHOC), the AUC will be based on parameters with ETA set to zero. Best regards, Mats Mats Karlsson, PhD Professor of Pharmacometrics Div. of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences Faculty of Pharmacy Uppsala University Box 591 SE-751 24 Uppsala Sweden phone +46 18 471 4105 fax +46 18 471 4003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____
Quoted reply history
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutson Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 07:00 To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] AUC Calculation in Simulation with and without EST I have data from PO, IP, and SQ(pump) infusions of this compound that I am modeling using 2-3 samples per mouse (30 critters worth), and the fits for a 1 cmpt are pretty good. In order to obtain a smooth plot to compare to the observed data, I have run N=1 simulations for a single "subject" (ID=1) using the bootstrapped parameters from all animals (each receiving drug via a single route). My question for the NMUSERS is this. When I just use $SIM without $EST, my AUC calculated by F1*AMT/CL is wildly different than the AUC I obtain by a quick trapezoidal check of my PRED column in the output file. When I use both $SIM and $EST as shown below, the integrated and trapezoidal AUCs agree. Why is there a difference? I presume that it is due to the use of a dummy value of "1" for DV throughout my initial data file, but I don't understand why. Thanks as always. (csv file follows ctl) (As always, any other suggestions to spruce up the code or my approach is appreciated.) Paul $PROBLEM CYCLOPAMIDE $INPUT ID TIME AMT RATE ADDL II PMP DV CMP RTE EVID $DATA ..\Lipinski_24PO.CSV IGNORE=# $SIMULATION (1111) $SUBROUTINES ADVAN2 TRANS2 $PK ALAG1=0 RTE1=0 RTE2=0 RTE3=0 IF(RTE.EQ.1) RTE1=1 IF(RTE.EQ.2) RTE2=1 IF(RTE.EQ.3) RTE3=1 F1=1 IF(RTE.EQ.1) F1=THETA(1); PO IF(RTE.EQ.2) F1=THETA(2); IP TVKA=THETA(3); GUT IF(RTE.EQ.2) TVKA=THETA(4); IP IF(RTE.EQ.3) TVKA=THETA(5); SQ PUMP CL=THETA(6)*EXP(ETA(1)); CL V=THETA(7)*EXP(ETA(2)); V KA=TVKA;*EXP(ETA(3)); ;IF(RTE.EQ.3) ALAG1=THETA(8)*EXP(ETA(4)) K=CL/V T12=0.693/K AUC=F1*AMT/CL TMAX=(LOG(KA)-LOG(K))/(KA-K) CMAX=(F1*AMT/V)*EXP(-K*TMAX) CAVE=F1*AMT/(CL*24) S2=V $ERROR IPRE = F W1=F DEL = 0 IF(IPRE.LT.0.001) DEL = 1 IRES = DV-IPRE; NEGATIVE TREND IS OVERESTIMATING IPRED WRT DV IWRE = IRES/(W1+DEL) Y=IPRE+EPS(1) $THETA 0.642; F1PO $THETA 1.267; F1IP $THETA 0.472; KAGUT $THETA 8.879; KAIP $THETA 4.564; KASQ $THETA 0.146; CL $THETA 0.289; V $OMEGA 0.313; ETACL $OMEGA 0.964; EtTAV $SIGMA 0.178; SIG1 $EST METH=1 INT NOABORT MAXEVAL=9999 POSTHOC $TABLE ID TIME AUC AMT K KA CL V F1 RTE ETA1 ETA2 NOPRINT ONEHEADER FILE=CycloSim.fit #AMT in micromoles,,,,,,,,,, #TIME in hours,,,,,,,,,, #DV in microMolar,,,,,,,,,, #COMP: 1 for PO_ 2 for blood_3 for IP_4 for SC,,,,,,,,,, #RTE: 1 for PO 2 for IP 3 for SQ Pump,,,,,,,,,, #ID,TIME,AMT,RATE,ADDL,II,DUR,DV,COMP,RTE,EVID 1,0,0.608,.,.,.,.,.,1,1,1 1,0.1,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.2,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.3,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.4,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.5,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.6,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.7,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.8,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,0.9,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,1,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,1.2,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,1.4,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,1.6,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,1.8,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,2,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,2.2,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,2.4,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,2.6,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,2.8,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,3,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,4,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,5,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,6,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,7,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,8,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,9,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,10,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,11,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,12,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,13,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,14,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,15,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,16,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,17,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,18,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,19,.,,,,,1,2,1,0 1,20,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,21,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,22,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,23,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,24,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,25,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,26,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,27,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,28,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,29,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,30,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,31,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,32,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,33,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,34,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,35,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,36,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,37,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,38,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,39,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,40,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,41,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,42,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,43,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,44,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,45,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,46,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,47,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 1,48,.,.,.,.,.,1,2,1,0 -- Paul R. Hutson, Pharm.D. Associate Professor UW School of Pharmacy 777 Highland Avenue Madison WI 53705-2222 Tel 608.263.2496 Fax 608.265.5421 Pager 608.265.7000, p7856
Jan 07, 2008 Joachim . Grevel AUC Calculation in Simulation with and without EST
Jan 07, 2008 Mats Karlsson RE: AUC Calculation in Simulation with and without EST
Jan 09, 2008 Paul Hutson Re: AUC Calculation in Simulation with and without EST