Re: Automated way to extract NM output
Dear all,
A comment on Xpose - no, support for multiple $PROBLEM statements is not
present in the current version (4.0PR6U1) - and this is not something
planned for Census, either, come to that. By a show of hands, is this
something people would like to see implemented?
Best regards
Justin Wilkins
Novartis Pharma AG
PH346, MODELING & SIMULATION
CHBS, WSJ-027.1.084
Novartis Pharma AG
Lichtstrasse 35
CH-4056 Basel
Switzerland
Phone: +41 61 324 6549
Fax: +41 61 324 3039
Mobile: +41 76 561 0949
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Holford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22.10.2007 08:17
To
[email protected]
cc
Subject
Re: [NMusers] Automated way to extract NM output
Mahesh,
The 'machinery' behind WFN is awk (actually the GNU gawk).
Did you try running your 500 problem run using WFN? WFN should extract the
output and summarise it in the *.smy file in the run output directory.
If WFN doesn't work please send me your control stream and data so I can
see what is happening.
Nick
> "Samtani, Mahesh [PRDUS]" wrote:
>
> Dear NMusers,
> I wish to run a $EST NM.ctl with 500 $PROBLEMs. Is there an automated
way to extract the 500 sets of thetas, omegas, sigmas, and minimization
statuses from the single output that NONMEM provides? Two related
questions are: a) What is the machinery that runs behind WFN for
extracting output after nmbs and b) Xpose31() extracts only a single set
(I think it is the first set); will downloading the newer version of Xpose
solve this problem?
>
> Kindly advice?Mahesh
>
--
Nick Holford, Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology
University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New
Zealand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+64(9)373-7599x86730 fax:+64(9)373-7090
www.health.auckland.ac.nz/pharmacology/staff/nholford