RE: covariate selection question

From: William Bachman Date: January 20, 2006 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Bill Bachman" bachmanw@comcast.net Subject: RE: [NMusers] covariate selection question Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:49:21 -0500 Mark, While I agree that stepwise covariate selection is neither the optimal nor most statistically rigorous method of model building, your "0 for 20" results seem contrary to numerous simulation and analysis studies in which the stepwise results are in good, if not perfect, accord with the known simulation model. To me this suggests that while not that the ultimate method, it is not completely ludicrous and could be a part of the modelers toolbox. To totally dismiss it seems a bit drastic in my opinion. Bill
Jan 17, 2006 Joern Loetsch covariate selection question
Jan 17, 2006 Mark Sale RE: covariate selection question
Jan 17, 2006 Joern Loetsch RE: covariate selection question
Jan 17, 2006 Michael Fossler RE: covariate selection question
Jan 17, 2006 Jakob Ribbing RE: covariate selection question
Jan 17, 2006 Mark Sale RE: covariate selection question
Jan 18, 2006 Mats Karlsson RE: covariate selection question
Jan 18, 2006 Paul Hutson RE: covariate selection question
Jan 18, 2006 Mark Sale RE: covariate selection question
Jan 18, 2006 Jogarao V Gobburu RE: covariate selection question
Jan 18, 2006 Mark Sale RE: covariate selection question
Jan 19, 2006 Kenneth Kowalski RE: covariate selection question
Jan 20, 2006 Mark Sale RE: covariate selection question
Jan 20, 2006 William Bachman RE: covariate selection question
Jan 20, 2006 Mark Sale RE: covariate selection question
Jan 20, 2006 Kenneth Kowalski RE: covariate selection question
Jan 20, 2006 Leonid Gibiansky RE: covariate selection question
Jan 20, 2006 Anthony J. Rossini RE: covariate selection question
Jan 24, 2006 Mats Karlsson RE: covariate selection question