Standard errors below 0.1%?

From: Nele Mueller-Plock Date: August 03, 2005 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Nele Plock" nplock@zedat.fu-berlin.de Subject: [NMusers] Standard errors below 0.1%? Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 09:41:48 +0200 Dear all, I have been trying to implement a model for data with both iv and oral dosing. The control stream is attached below. By using a model with first order absorption I could get the covariance step to run. However, using a model with zero order absorption led to a big drop in OF, although the runs terminate due to rounding errors. When I change the TOLERANCE from 5 to 4 the run is successful and the covariance step as well. What is weird though is that the highest standard error is estimated to be 0.1%, all others are even below that value. Now my questions are as follows: What exactly does the change in TOL do that leads to a successful run? Has anybody ever seen standard errors that low? What could be the reason, because frankly speaking I dont trust those values at all? Any help would be appreciated! Nele ;PROJECT: test ;STUDY: iv/po multiple dose ;RUN: 048 ;KINETICIST: N. Plock ;NOTES: 2-COMP. MODEL, COMBINED ERROR MODEL ;NOTES: IIV ON K10, V1, V2, D1, CL, zero order absorption, FOCE INT method $PROBLEM iv/po $INPUT ID TIME TILD AMT RATE ADMA CMT DV FLMA EVID VIST OCC DAY AGE SEX HT CID=DROP TYPE=DROP FUPL FLAG $DATA ivpo_220705_ID01-33 IGNORE=# $SUBROUTINES ADVAN6 TRANS1 TOL4 $MODEL NCOMPS=4 COMP=(CENTRAL, DEFOBS) COMP=(PERIP1) COMP=(DELAY) COMP=(ELIM) $PK TVK10=THETA(1) K10=TVK10*EXP(ETA(1)) TVV1=THETA(2) V1=TVV1*EXP(ETA(2)) TVQ=THETA(3) Q=TVQ TVV2=THETA(4) V2=TVV2*EXP(ETA(3)) TVD1=THETA(5) D1=TVD1*EXP(ETA(4)) ALAG1=0 IF (ID.EQ.3.AND.OCC.GT.1) ALAG1=THETA(6) IF (ID.EQ.6.AND.OCC.GT.1) ALAG1=THETA(6) IF (ID.EQ.9.AND.OCC.GT.1) ALAG1=THETA(6) TVEC50=THETA(7) EC50=TVEC50 TVEMAX=THETA(8) EMAX=TVEMAX TVKIC=THETA(9) KIC=TVKIC TVCL=THETA(10) CL=TVCL*EXP(ETA(5)) S1=V1 K14=CL/V1 K12=Q/V1 K21=Q/V2 $DES CLIN=A(1)/V1 DADT(1)=-A(1)*K12+A(2)*K21-A(1)*K10*(1-EMAX*A(3)/(A(3)+EC50))-K14*A(1) DADT(2) = A(1)*K12 -A(2)*K21 DADT(3) = KIC*(CLIN-A(3)) CL2=K10*(1-EMAX*A(3)/(A(3)+EC50))*V1 $ERROR IPRED=F DEL=0 IF (IPRED.EQ.0) DEL=0.0001 W=F IRES=DV-IPRED IWRES=IRES/(W+DEL) Y=IPRED+W*EPS(1)+EPS(2) ;---------------------------------------INITIAL ESTIMATES----------------------------------- $THETA (0.05,0.14) ; 1 K10 $THETA (0.1,21.2) ; 2 V1 $THETA (0.1,76) ; 3 Q $THETA (0.1,30) ; 4 V2 $THETA (0.001,1) ; 5 D1 $THETA 1.23 FIX ; 6 ALAG1 $THETA (0.1,0.15) ; 7 EC50 $THETA 1 FIX ; 8 EMAX $THETA (0.001,0.005) ; 9 KIC $THETA (0.1,7.5) ; 10 CL $OMEGA 5 ; 1 IIV_K10 $OMEGA 0.15 ; 2 IIV_V1 $OMEGA 0.1 ; 3 IIV_V2 $OMEGA 0.4 ; 4 IIV_D1 $OMEGA 0.3 ; 5 IIV_CL $SIGMA 0.01 ; prop.error $SIGMA 0.1 ; add. error $ESTIMATION PRINT=5 METHOD=1 INTERACTION MSFO=msf MAXEVAL=9999 NOABORT $COV $TABLE ID TIME IPRED IWRES ONEHEADER NOPRINT FILE=sdtab $TABLE ID ETA1 ETA2 ETA3 ETA4 ETA5 K10 V1 Q K14 V2 D1 ALAG1 EC50 EMAX KIC CL CL2 Q FLAG ONEHEADER NOPRINT FILE=patab
Aug 03, 2005 Nele Mueller-Plock Standard errors below 0.1%?
Aug 03, 2005 William Bachman RE: Standard errors below 0.1%?
Aug 03, 2005 Leonid Gibiansky RE: Standard errors below 0.1%?