Re: Simulation vs. actual data
From: "Nick Holford" n.holford@auckland.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [NMusers] Simulation vs. actual data
Date: Tue, June 14, 2005 2:48 pm
Toufigh,
I think you are describing a visual predictive check i.e. simulate from your final
model with say 1000 subjects, then calculate the average and 90% empirical
prediction interval from the resulting 1000 predictions at each time point.
You can plot the average and 90% PI over time and overlay the observed
concentrations. About 90% of your observations should lie within the 90% PI. The
average vs time can be considered the population behaviour while the 90% PI shows
the extent of variability including random effects in parameters and random effects
due to residual error.
If you think you have linear kinetics you can dose normalize the observed
concentrations to some standard dose and do the simulation with this standard dose.
This let's you use one plot to display the results and expected profile for all
doses you have studied.
Nick