RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect

From: Serge Guzy Date: August 23, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Serge Guzy" GUZY@xoma.com Subject: RE: [NMusers] Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect Date: Mon, August 23, 2004 1:26 pm May be I did not understand but if you model V1 the way you did, V1 across individuals will be different because of their difference in weight. Your first model will give you the same V1 for everybody. If I am right, the two models are different. If there is a real correlation between V1 and weight, the latter could be bigger than the remaining random effect which then can be ignored. Serge Guzy
Aug 23, 2004 Peter Bonate Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 23, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 23, 2004 Alan Xiao RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 23, 2004 Mats Karlsson RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 23, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 23, 2004 Serge Guzy RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 24, 2004 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 24, 2004 Vanapalli_Sreenivasa RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect
Aug 24, 2004 Serge Guzy RE: Decrease in OFV with a fixed effect