RE: calculation of time-to-nadir

From: Erik Olofsen Date: July 30, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Olofsen, E. (ANST)" Subject: RE:[NMusers] calculation of time-to-nadir Date: Fri, July 30, 2004 6:52 am Dear Anthe, Perhaps the idea implemented in the control file below can be of help. It considers the case where the analytical solution exists: TMAXE is the time where the concentration in compartment 2 attains a maximum. The derivative will never be exactly zero, but it will become negative. The higher the value of TOL, the more often $DES will be called at different time values, and the more accurate the estimate, available as A(4) (at the end of TIME), will be. So the trick is to integrate 1 until Tmax. Cmax is also available as A(3). Best regards, Erik Olofsen $PROBLEM CMAX $INPUT TIME AMT RATE MDV X1 X2 DV $DATA cmax.d $SUBROUTINES ADVAN6 TOL=6 $MODEL COMP = CENTRAL COMP = EFFECT COMP = CMAX COMP = TMAX $PK K = THETA(1) KE0 = THETA(2) TMAXE = (LOG(K)-LOG(KE0))/(K-KE0) $DES DADT(1) = -K*A(1) D2 = KE0*(A(1)-A(2)) DADT(2) = D2 IF (D2.GT.0) THEN DADT(3) = D2 DADT(4) = 1 ELSE DADT(3) = 0 DADT(4) = 0 ENDIF $ERROR Y1 = A(1) Y2 = A(2) Y3 = A(3) Y4 = A(4) Y = Y2*(1+ERR(1)) $THETA 0.01 0.03 $OMEGA 0.001 $EST $TABLE FILE=stream NOPRINT NOHEADER TIME AMT RATE MDV Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 TMAXE A data file to test this with: 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 9.0484E-01 2.4603E-01 2.3131E-01 2.4603E-01 -1.4716E-02 0.0000E+00 2.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 8.1873E-01 4.0488E-01 4.1299E-01 4.0488E-01 8.1097E-03 0.0000E+00 3.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 7.4082E-01 5.0137E-01 4.9237E-01 5.0137E-01 -9.0010E-03 0.0000E+00 4.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 6.7032E-01 5.5369E-01 5.3405E-01 5.5369E-01 -1.9643E-02 0.0000E+00 5.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 6.0653E-01 5.7510E-01 5.8321E-01 5.7510E-01 8.1137E-03 0.0000E+00 6.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 5.4881E-01 5.7527E-01 5.8127E-01 5.7527E-01 6.0053E-03 0.0000E+00 7.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 4.9659E-01 5.6119E-01 5.4722E-01 5.6119E-01 -1.3975E-02 0.0000E+00 8.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 4.4933E-01 5.3792E-01 5.4652E-01 5.3792E-01 8.6028E-03 0.0000E+00 9.0000E+01 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 4.0657E-01 5.0905E-01 4.9859E-01 5.0905E-01 -1.0452E-02 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+02 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 3.6788E-01 4.7714E-01 4.9331E-01 4.7714E-01 1.6172E-02 0.0000E+00
Jul 29, 2004 Anthe Zandvliet calculation of time-to-nadir
Jul 29, 2004 Nick Holford RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Jul 30, 2004 Anthe Zandvliet RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Jul 30, 2004 Nick Holford RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Jul 30, 2004 Anthe Zandvliet RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Jul 30, 2004 Erik Olofsen RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Jul 30, 2004 Anthe Zandvliet RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Aug 03, 2004 Nick Holford RE: calculation of time-to-nadir
Aug 03, 2004 Erik Olofsen RE: calculation of time-to-nadir