some issues about NONMEM

From: Ferdinand Rombout Date: February 10, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Rombout, Dr. Ferdinand" - Ferdinand.Rombout@grunenthal.de Subject: [NMusers] some issues about NONMEM Date: 2/10/2004 10:51 AM Dear all, I can do nothing else than fully agree with the remarks about patches. Recently I lost an email from the discussion group about one patch. Luckely I remembered seeing this email and could get some information from Globomax. However my own search in the stored messages did not lead to any finding!! If I had not read the email, I would not have been aware. In light of 21CFRpart11 requirements from the FDA this is not acceptable. Globomax should have the obligation to notify each person having a valid NONMEM licens about any need for changes and they should do so in writing to each individual separate (I think we users have that right by having the yearly license fee). They should also advice users whether revalidation of systems/previous results are needed. Regards, Ferdie Rombout
Feb 10, 2004 Xiaofeng Wang some issues about NONMEM
Feb 10, 2004 Ferdinand Rombout some issues about NONMEM
Feb 11, 2004 Nick Holford some issues about NONMEM
Feb 11, 2004 Diane Mould Re: some issues about NONMEM
Feb 11, 2004 Marc Gastonguay Re: some issues about NONMEM
Feb 11, 2004 Nick Holford some issues about NONMEM
Feb 12, 2004 Vladimir Piotrovskij Re: some issues about NONMEM
Feb 12, 2004 Marc Gastonguay Re: some issues about NONMEM
Feb 12, 2004 Marc Gastonguay Re: some issues about NONMEM
Feb 12, 2004 Xiaofeng Wang Re: some issues about NONMEM
Feb 12, 2004 Nick Holford some issues about NONMEM