Likelihood

From: Lewis B. Sheiner Date: April 02, 2002 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: LSheiner Subject: [NMusers] Likelihood Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:44:22 -0800 FYI ...
Quoted reply history
-------- Original Message -------- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 09:26:32 -0800 (PST) From: "S.Beal" To: lewis Assuming that there is a covariate being tested that allows Y to be set as above for a PK observation and differently for a PD observation, in principle the above should work. There could be any number of reasons peculiar to the user's set-up that accounts for the error message. It is possible that the argument of EXP is becoming very negative, and due to the heavy-truncation of the EXP function, the likelihood has become 0. It might be better to use the option -2LL, rather than LIKE (and code the above accordingly). Stu
Apr 02, 2002 Chuanpu Hu Simultaneous modeling of PK and categorical PD
Apr 02, 2002 Nick Holford RE: Simultaneous modeling of PK and categorical PD
Apr 02, 2002 Nelamangala V Nagaraja RE: Simultaneous modeling of PK and categorical PD
Apr 02, 2002 Nick Holford Re: Simultaneous modeling of PK and categorical PD
Apr 02, 2002 Lewis B. Sheiner Likelihood
Apr 02, 2002 Chuanpu Hu RE: Likelihood
Apr 03, 2002 Nick Holford Simultaneous Continuous and Categorical Modelling