BQLs

From: Peter Bonate Date: June 26, 2001 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: peter.bonate@quintiles.com Subject: BQLs Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:01:13 -0500 I have a question for the group and that concerns the handling of BQLs. Some set them equal to missing, yet others set them equal to one-half the LOQ of the assay and then have some small residual variance term included in the error statement. This latter method has always bothered me because of the 1/2 LOQ issue. The value itself is completely arbitrary and wouldn't this set up the possibility of a mixture model for some pk parameters? What does the group think about instead of assigning one-half LOQ to the missing values, assigning a random value on the uniform interval 0(+) to LOQ. This would insure continuity. Then adding a dichotomous variable that is 0 or 1 to indicate whether the value is imputed and include this as a separate variance term to account for the additional uncertainty in the imputed concentration value. Any thoughts? Pete Bonate
Jun 26, 2001 Peter Bonate BQLs
Jun 26, 2001 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: BQLs