RE: Covariate Models Using Weight

From: Vladimir Piotrovskij Date: November 19, 1999 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Piotrovskij, Vladimir [JanBe]" <VPIOTROV@janbe.jnj.com> Subject: RE: Covariate Models Using Weight Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:09:44 +0100 Good point, Steve. Mechanistic considerations are very useful and can guide model development. Just one example from own practice: a drug is eliminated exclusively via renal route. WT and CLCR are almost equal as predictors for CL. What to prefer? I prefer CLCR to WT since I know the mechanism of elimination. CLCR and WT are highly correlated and that is why the inclusion of WT in CL submodel works as well as CLCR. The problem of correleted predictors! Mechanistic considerations help selecting right predictors. Vladimir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Vladimir Piotrovsky, Ph.D. Janssen Research Foundation Clinical Pharmacokinetics B-2340 Beerse Belgium Email: vpiotrov@janbe.jnj.com
Nov 22, 1999 Karin Fattinger Covariate Models Using Weight
Nov 19, 1999 Stephen Duffull Re: Covariate Models Using Weight
Nov 19, 1999 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Covariate Models Using Weight
Nov 19, 1999 James Gallo Re: Covariate Models Using Weight
Nov 21, 1999 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Covariate Models Using Weight
Nov 21, 1999 James Gallo Re: Covariate Models Using Weight
Nov 22, 1999 James CrCL, 51-CrEDTA etc.