QA audited Linux supplier?

Hi, We are about to establish a validated NONMEM installation on a Linux cluster. Does anyone have experience with Linux-suppliers (e.g. Ret Hat, Novell) who has passed a QA audit from the pharmaceutical industry for this operating system? If yes, which suppliers did you use and how was the overall outcome of the audit? Did you use the same supplier for Mosix? br Steen __________________________ Steen Hvass Ingwersen Manager Biomodelling Novo Nordisk A/S Novo Allé DK-2880 Bagsværd Denmark +45 4443 4847 (direct) +45 3079 4847 (mobile) +45 4466 3939 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for the addressee(s) stated above only and may contain confidential information protected by law. You are hereby notified that any unauthorized reading, disclosure, copying or distribution of this e-mail or use of information contained herein is strictly prohibited and may violate rights to proprietary information. If you are not an intended recipient, please return this e-mail to the sender and delete it immediately hereafter. Thank you.

On 3/12/07, SI (Steen Hvass Ingwersen) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > We are about to establish a validated NONMEM installation on a Linux cluster. > Does anyone have experience with Linux-suppliers (e.g. Ret Hat, Novell) who has > passed a QA audit from the pharmaceutical industry for this operating system? > If yes, which suppliers did you use and how was the overall outcome of the > audit? Did you use the same supplier for Mosix? Hi Steen - I'd be careful with OpenMosix -- development is a bit slow these days and may require an older kernel (suboptimal on newer machines); you might do better with a more explicit job queuing system. best, -tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Muttenz, Switzerland. "Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05).