Omega Block off Diagonals

2 messages 2 people Latest: Jun 27, 2003

Omega Block off Diagonals

From: Brett Houk Date: June 27, 2003 technical
From: Brett Houk <bhouk@amgen.com> Subject: [NMusers] Omega Block off Diagonals Date: 6/27/2003 12:33 PM Users, I am currently running a placebo effect mixture model (responders and non-responders) with Omega Block (3) and getting off diagonal elements coming up as negative. Has anyone seen this result previously, and/or does anyone have any insight as to the meaning of such a result? I will past the control stream and final parameter est. below. Thanks, Brett $PROB PLACEBO MIXTURE MODEL $INPUT C ID TIME DV $DATA data.csv IGNORE=C $PRED CALLFL = 1 EST = MIXEST TVE0=THETA(1) E0=TVE0*EXP(ETA(1)) IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN EMAX = THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3)) ELSE EMAX = THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) ENDIF TVIT=THETA(4) IT50=TVIT*EXP(ETA(4)) TVHL=THETA(5) HILL=TVHL F=E0*(1-(EMAX*(TIMW**HILL))/((IT50**HILL)+(TIMW**HILL))) IPRED=F W=(THETA(6)**2+F*F*THETA(7)**2)**0.5 IRES=DV-IPRED IWRES=IRES/W Y=F+W*EPS(1) $MIX NSPOP= 2 P(1) = THETA(8) P(2) = 1 - THETA(8) $OMEGA BLOCK (3) 0.2 0.01 0.2 0.01 0.01 0.2 $OMEGA BLOCK (1) 0.2 $THETA (18.1) ;THETA(1) TVE0 typical value of E0 (-0.02) ;THETA(2) Emax for population 1 (0.135) ;THETA(3) Emax for population 2 (0, 5.28) ;THETA(4) TVIT typical value for IT50 (0, 1.98) ;THETA(5) TVHL typical value of Hill Factor (0, 2.42) ;THETA(6) Additive error term (0, 0.001) ;THETA(8) Proportional error term (0, 0.765, 1) ;THETA(7) Proportion of population in Pop1 $SIGMA 1 FIX; Eps(1) $COV $EST NOABORT MAXEVAL=9999 POSTHOC **************************************************************************** ****************************** THETA - VECTOR OF FIXED EFFECTS PARAMETERS ********* TH 1 TH 2 TH 3 TH 4 TH 5 TH 6 TH 7 TH 8 1.84E+01 1.08E-02 8.80E-02 5.33E+00 1.98E+00 2.43E+00 4.89E-08 7.47E-01 OMEGA - COV MATRIX FOR RANDOM EFFECTS - ETAS ******** ETA1 ETA2 ETA3 ETA4 ETA1 + 1.88E-01 ETA2 + -3.30E+00 2.56E+02 ETA3 + 1.04E+00 -4.19E+01 6.84E+01 ETA4 + 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.37E+01

Re: Omega Block off Diagonals

From: Leonid Gibiansky Date: June 27, 2003 technical
From: Leonid Gibiansky <lgibiansky@emmes.com> Subject: Re: [NMusers] Omega Block off Diagonals Date: 6/27/2003 12:55 PM There is nothing unusual in these results. This just means that the correlation between the parameters is negative. Elements of OMEGA matrix are defined as OMEGA_i_j=mean(eta_i * eta_j). Negative correlation roughly means that when eta_1 is positive, eta_2 is more often negative than positive. If eta1 is random effect on CL and eta2 is random effect on V, this means that individuals with higher CL tend to have smaller V. Leonid _______________________________________________________