Re: NONMEM related implementation question
Hi Santosh,
Yes, with your setup, having EVID=2 records with e.g. DV=“.” for missing: the
$TABLE output would per default include both the EVID=0 (observation) and
EVID=2 (to obtain predictions) records.
So if you output (in table file) IPRED or e.g. CIPREDI, these could contain
predictions for both types of records.
Best regards
Jakob
Jakob Ribbing, Ph.D.
Principal Consultant, Pharmetheus AB
Cell/Mobile: +46 (0)70 514 33 77
[email protected]
www.pharmetheus.com
Phone, Office: +46 (0)18 513 328
Uppsala Science Park, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 36B
SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
Quoted reply history
> On 25 Feb 2024, at 21:41, Santosh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am familiar with the classic estimation/simulation methodology, wherein
> predicted values (of DV, for example) are obtained after applying estimation
> ($ESTIMATION) followed by simulation ($SIMULATION) ....
>
>
> Is there a way to use an input NM dataset (having inserted longitudinal
> records with blank DV ( EVID=2) such that non-missing DV records are used for
> estimation and predicted DV values are generated for all EVID (including
> EVID=2) records with only $ESTIMATION method?
>
>
> TIA
> Santosh
>
>
--
*This communication is confidential and is only intended for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is directed. It may contain information
that is privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately. Please do not
copy it or disclose its contents to any other person.*
*Any personal data
will be processed in accordance with Pharmetheus' privacy notice, available
here https://pharmetheus.com/privacy-policy/.**
*