Re: NONMEM Error on SAEM but not FOCEI

From: Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap Date: January 26, 2024 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Omar, What you describe is not that strange. It can happen because SAEM does random sampling whereas FOCE-I uses a directed search. Therefore extreme values can occur with SAEM. Please refer to the section I60 of user guide for v7+ "Stable Routines for Estimation Methods and Automated Protection Against Floating Point Exceptions" for more detail, but you could start with including $ABBR PROTECT which probably is adequate in your case. Hope this helps, Jeroen http://pd-value.com [email protected] @PD_value +31 6 23118438 -- More value out of your data!
Quoted reply history
On 26-01-2024 16:01, Elashkar, Omar I. wrote: > Hello NMusers, > > I have created a model that fit ok with FOCE+I. When I try to fit with SAEM, I get the following error: > > """ > ERROR IN TRANS4 ROUTINE: Q IS ZERO > Elapsed estimation time in seconds: 0.00 > INDIVIDUAL OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUES ARE ALL ZERO. PROBLEM ENDED > """ > > The data is very small, but the model seems acceptable from bootstrap on FOCE+I. Any ideas are appreciated! > > Thank you, > Omar > > *Omar Elashkar, *B.Pharm, MSc > > Graduate Assistant > > University of Florida | College of Pharmacy
Jan 26, 2024 Omar I Elashkar NONMEM Error on SAEM but not FOCEI
Jan 26, 2024 Leonid Gibiansky Re: NONMEM Error on SAEM but not FOCEI
Jan 26, 2024 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap Re: NONMEM Error on SAEM but not FOCEI
Jan 26, 2024 Mark Sale RE: NONMEM Error on SAEM but not FOCEI
Jan 29, 2024 Robert Bauer NONMEM Error on SAEM but not FOCEI