Statistical power of covariate inclusion in popPK models

From: Ibtihel Hammami Date: March 24, 2021 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi, Thank you all for your answers. I have two follow-up questions: 1. Is it mandatory to use the matrix R as a variance co-variance matrix to obtain the FIM? In case we have already used other type of variance co-variance matrix, should we rerun the model with matrix R setting? 2. How critical is the estimation method for the computed SE? In other words, is it relevant to compare two powers computed based on two standard errors givens by different estimation algorithms? For example, if we used FOCE-INTER to minimize our model, could we compare the power (based on the Wald test) to results given by PFIM which is based on FO ? Just for a little bit of background to clarify why we are interested in the Wald test. We are working on the comparison of different methods to compute the statistical power of covariate inclusion in popPK models (SSE (gold standard), MCMP, PPE , and Wald test). We have also included the Wald test in our comparison because it is the fastest method and mostly because it used by optimal designs software. Therefore, the evaluation of the accuracy of the power derived by this method could facilitate the bridging step between model validation and the design of upcoming clinical trials using optimal design software. Thank you in advance. Cordially. Ibtihel HAMMAMI.
Mar 24, 2021 Ibtihel -fr Hammami Statistical power of covariate inclusion in popPK models
Mar 24, 2021 Ibtihel Hammami Statistical power of covariate inclusion in popPK models
Mar 24, 2021 Kenneth Kowalski RE: Statistical power of covariate inclusion in popPK models