Re: Time-varying bioavailability and reproducibility in NONMEM analysis

From: Leonid Gibiansky Date: February 11, 2020 technical Source: mail-archive.com
could you show equations? Bioavailability is treated differently in Nonmem and R, so code should reflect it. Thanks Leonid
Quoted reply history
On 2/11/2020 3:52 AM, Le Louedec Felicien wrote: > Dear NONMEM users, > > I’m struggling for a couple of weeks against contradictory results between NONMEM and R analysis of the same data with the same model which includes a time-varying bioavailability. Here is a simplified example of my issue: > > On the one hand, let’s introduce a bicompartmental model with a depot compartment, where bioavailability is decreasing over time given a maximum in decrease (MAXDECR) and a first-order decay constant (LAMBDA). Instead of the variable TIME, I use a covariate TOLD (Time Of Last Dose) in order to be sure that the value of F1 computed by NONMEM will be independent of the time used for computation: > > --- > > $INPUT CID TIME EVID AMT CMT DV MDV TOLD > > $MODEL COMP=(DEPOT) COMP=(CENTRAL) COMP=(PERIPH) > > $PK > > MAXDECR = THETA(1) > > LAMBDA = THETA(2) / 24 ; TIME is in hour, Lambda in day-1 > > F1 = 1 - MAXDECR + MAXDECR * EXP(-LAMBDA * TOLD) > > $THETA > > (0, 0.5, 1) FIX > > (0, 0.15 ) FIX > > --- > > On the other hand, we have a dataset of 28 IDs with: > > -the same dosing regimen of 400 mg qd for 28 days (one line with EVID=1 per administration, no ADDL). > > -different “sampling occasions” at 0h, 6h, 12 and 18h post-dose; at day 1 for ID1, at day 1&2 for ID2, at day 1&2&3 for ID3, and so on until ID28 who has a complete PK exploration from day 1 to 28. All these lines are filled with EVID=0, DV=., and MDV=1. > > Then, I estimate these concentrations in maximum a posteriori Bayesian manner (MAXEVAL = 0) with ADVAN 13 (there is no inter-individual nor residual variability). > > My problem is that NONMEM found different concentrations in these 28 individuals, even though they received the same dose. Besides, as excepted, I found that all individuals had the same value for F1 (at a given time point). > > Would any of you have an idea of why NONMEM does not return the same predictions ? > > Thank you very much in advance > > Kind regards > > Félicien LE LOUEDEC, PharmD > > PhD student > > Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, FRANCE > > Team 14: « Dose Individualization of Anticancer Drugs » > > +335 31 15 55 69 > > [email protected] < mailto: [email protected] >
Feb 11, 2020 Le Louedec Felicien Time-varying bioavailability and reproducibility in NONMEM analysis
Feb 11, 2020 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Time-varying bioavailability and reproducibility in NONMEM analysis
Feb 11, 2020 Saeheum Song Re: Time-varying bioavailability and reproducibility in NONMEM analysis
Feb 11, 2020 Kyle Baron Re: Time-varying bioavailability and reproducibility in NONMEM analysis
Feb 12, 2020 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Time-varying bioavailability and reproducibility in NONMEM analysis