RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block

From: Daren Austin Date: June 06, 2018 technical Source: mail-archive.com
I take the post-hoc PK parameters table, read them into SAS and execute the ODE model with small time steps using proc model. Sort the results by Cmax descending and select first observation for Cmax and Tmax. Precision is based solely on the number of time points in the data step. The table of parameters can be expanded to include other summary measures, and is saved as a CSV file for SAS dataset for further reporting. Kind regards, Daren Daren Austin GSK Senior Fellow Senior Director, Clinical Pharmacology Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation Quantitative Sciences GSK Stockley Park West, 1-3 Ironbridge Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT, UK Email [email protected] Mobile +44 7712 670097 Tel +44 20 89903689 gsk.com | Twitter | YouTube | Facebook | Flickr
Quoted reply history
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leonid Gibiansky Sent: 04 May 2018 00:59 To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] Cmax/Tmax in the DES block EXTERNAL Interesting experience concerning computation of Cmax and Tmax (and probably other stats) in the DES block. We used to use this way: http://cognigencorp.com/nonmem/current/2007-December/4125.html Specifically, reserved the place in the memory: $ABB COMRES=2 Set these values to zero for each new subject: $PK IF(NEWIND.LE.1) THEN COM(1)=0 COM(2)=0 ENDIF and computed Cmax/TMAX as $DES IF(CONC.GT.COM(1)) THEN COM(1)=CONC COM(2)=T ENDIF $ERROR CMAX=COM(1) TMAX=COM(2) Recently I applied the same procedure to compute Cmax following 1 hr IV infusion. Unexpectedly, Tmax was estimated at times > 1 hr, and Cmax was higher than 1-hr concentration (true Cmax is at 1 hr). After some experiments, the explanation was that Nonmem computes concentration-time course (with infusion ON) for longer than 1 hr, and resulting Cmax/Tmax are at the end of the "computation window" rather than at 1 hr. Turns out that the results also depend on ADVAN routine. The largest deviation (still small, 1-3 percents) was for ADVAN8, ADVAN9, and ADVAN13. ADVAN15 was better but still off. ADVAN14 was almost perfect but still slightly (0.01%) off. ADVAN6 provided correct answer (up to the precision of the output). So, the discrepancy is small but if 1-2% difference is important, one has to be careful when using DES block computations. Thanks Leonid GSK monitors email communications sent to and from GSK in order to protect GSK, our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, from cyber threats and loss of GSK Information. GSK monitoring is conducted with appropriate confidentiality controls and in accordance with local laws and after appropriate consultation. ________________________________ This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
May 03, 2018 Leonid Gibiansky Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Leonid Gibiansky Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Bob Leary RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Brian Sadler RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Paolo Denti Re: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Kyle Baron Re: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Robert Bauer RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 04, 2018 Kevin Feng RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 05, 2018 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
May 06, 2018 Robert Bauer RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block
Jun 06, 2018 Daren Austin RE: Cmax/Tmax in the DES block