RE: nonmem question regarding condition number

From: DJ Eleveld-Ufkes Date: March 24, 2016 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Laureen, If you want an objective second opinion then make likelihood profiles for both models. I expect a very shallow one for at least one maybe two parameters for the 3-compartment model and thus the parameters are not estimated accurately, even if the objective function goes down. good luck, Douglas Eleveld
Quoted reply history
________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of L.A. ten Berg - Lammers [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:10 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: [NMusers] nonmem question regarding condition number Dear nmusers, I am currently analyzing PK profiles after a single iv adminstration. Volunteers were sampled frequently: 12 samples per curve. For the structural model 2- and a 3-compartment models are compared. The CWRES vs time plot of the 2-compartment shows the typical wave, indicative for a 3-compartment model. Introduction of a third compartment eliminated the wave, OFV decreased with 180 points, precision of the estimates did change notably, but the condition number increased from 998 to 2.0*E16. Does anyone know how to interpret this large increase in condition number? Best wishes, Laureen ten Berg [Beschrijving: cid:[email protected]] Laureen ten Berg-Lammers Hospital Pharmacist Academisch Medisch Centrum Universiteit van Amsterdam Meibergdreef 9 | 1105 AZ Amsterdam | Room: M01-224 Tel: +31(0)20-5662726 | Pager *62726 | [email protected] ________________________________ AMC Disclaimer : https://www.amc.nl/disclaimer ________________________________ ________________________________
Mar 24, 2016 L.a. Ten Berg - Lammers nonmem question regarding condition number
Mar 24, 2016 Bill Denney RE: nonmem question regarding condition number
Mar 24, 2016 Carolina Consuelo Llanos Paez RE: nonmem question regarding condition number
Mar 24, 2016 Sven Mensing Re: nonmem question regarding condition number
Mar 24, 2016 Ayyappa Chaturvedula Re: nonmem question regarding condition number
Mar 24, 2016 DJ Eleveld-Ufkes RE: nonmem question regarding condition number
Mar 24, 2016 Herbert Struemper RE: nonmem question regarding condition number