RE: NONMEM vs SPSS

From: Erik Olofsen Date: March 29, 2014 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Gavin, Perhaps an idea is to compare the different MATRIX options of the covariance step of NONMEM, and with the bootstrap, to assess their relative properties. Erik
Quoted reply history
________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Gavin Jarvis [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] NONMEM vs SPSS Dear NONMEM Users Does anyone have a view on the relative merits/reliability/accuracy of NONMEM ($COV step) vs SPSS (NLR) with respect to their derived values of the parameter standard errors and parameter correlation matrices? The data I am analysing are single subject (not population). Parameter estimates from the two programs are, to all intents and purposes, identical. However, the SE values from NONMEM $COV are consistently smaller by 1.5-2.0-fold. Any thoughts? Gavin __________________________________________________ Dr Gavin E Jarvis MA PhD VetMB MRCVS University Lecturer in Veterinary Anatomy Department of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience Physiological Laboratory Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EG Tel: +44 (0) 1223 333745 Fellow and College Lecturer in Pharmacology Selwyn College Cambridge CB3 9DQ Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761303 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Web: http://www.pdn.cam.ac.uk/staff/jarvis Twit: @GavinEJarvis
Mar 29, 2014 Gavin Jarvis NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 29, 2014 Erik Olofsen RE: NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 29, 2014 Nick Holford Re: NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 29, 2014 Kenneth Kowalski RE: NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 29, 2014 Robert Bauer RE: NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 31, 2014 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 31, 2014 Gavin Jarvis RE: NONMEM vs SPSS
Mar 31, 2014 Erik Olofsen RE: NONMEM vs SPSS