criteria for implementing BSV-V2 and BSV-Q

From: Carolien Hazendonk Date: March 19, 2014 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear all, In the present project a two compartmental structural model adequately describes our data. Estimated parameters are Cl, V1, Q and V2, between-subject varibility is estimated for CL and V1 - estimates are precise. In the further development of the structural model introduction of BSV on either V2 and Q produced a significant drop in objective function of -17 points. Estimates were however large (>100%) with moderate precision (40-50%) and large shrinkage (40-50%). We are aware that interpreting the goodness of fit plots with these shrinkage values is not reliable (Savic & Karlsson 2009). We are wondering what criteria to use for implementing BSV-V2 and BSV-Q in the structural model. Kind regards, Carolien Hazendonk Drs. H.C.A.M. Hazendonk, M.D. PhD-student Department of (Pediatric)Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam E-mail address: [email protected]
Mar 19, 2014 Carolien Hazendonk criteria for implementing BSV-V2 and BSV-Q
Mar 19, 2014 Devin Pastoor RE: criteria for implementing BSV-V2 and BSV-Q
Mar 19, 2014 Ekaterina Gibiansky Re: criteria for implementing BSV-V2 and BSV-Q