Re: Additive residual error

From: Bill Denney Date: February 12, 2013 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Siwei, In a similar situation previously, I've found fixing the additive error to a small value (~= 0.0001*LOQ) has provided a work-around for this. It usually arises from a zero measurement needing to be nonzero for estimation purposes. A better fix is to use the M2 method which should lower the constraint of needing additive error. Thanks, Bill
Quoted reply history
On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:27 PM, "siwei Dai" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, NM users: > > I have a typical 2-compartment model that can describe my data quite well, > except the final gradient for the additive residual error is '0'. I therefore > fix the additive residual error to '0', but then NM would not run. I tried > different initial estimations for other parameters but the additive residual > error seems to be the one that decide whether NM will run. Can anyone tell me > why this would happen and how to solve it? > > Thank you very much in advance for your help. > > Siwei
Feb 12, 2013 Siwei Dai Additive residual error
Feb 11, 2013 Bill Denney Re: Additive residual error
Feb 12, 2013 Bill Denney Re: Additive residual error
Feb 12, 2013 Nick Holford Re: Additive residual error
Feb 12, 2013 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Additive residual error