Minimisation problem...
Dear NMusers
I am trying to analyse data from a study in which samples were taken from
each subject at 4 different time points (t=0,5,10,14). The problem with the
data is that there are many missing data points and there is considerable
variation between the subjects.
The subjects are in either a control or a test group, and I want to
determine whether there is any difference in the data values between these
groups.
Overall, it looks like the data values increase with time, but there is a
suggestion that in the test group the increase is not sustained but returns
to baseline levels by t=14, whereas the control group is either levelled off
or possibly still rising.
I have used a polynomial model to fit the data up to the 3rd power (which I
think is probably too much) and included additive parameters to modify each
of the coefficients from the polynomial model.
The problem I have is as follows:
When I use the FOCE method the ETA terms collapse towards zero. The quality
of the fit looks poor when judged by a plot of DV against individual
predicted values.
When I use the BAYES method, I get credible ETA values and a much better fit
(i.e., DV vs ipred clusters sensibly around a line of unity).
However, I cannot use the OBJV value from the BAYES method to carry out
hypothesis testing. The final reported parameter estimates following the
BAYES method are sensitive to initial starting values and the number of
iterations performed. If I use the parameter values obtained with the BAYES
method I can determine an accurate OBJV for those parameter values using
FOCE with just 1 evaluation. However, if I perform a minimisation with FOCE
starting with those values, the ETA values collapse and the DV vs ipred plot
looks awful again.
I hope this makes some sense to someone out there - I'm a bit of a novice at
NONMEM. I realise the data is far from ideal, but it would be great to get
some statistical information about the difference between the two groups. If
anyone had any suggestions I would be grateful. The biological
interpretation of the experiment will change significantly depending on
which way this goes!
Thanks
Gavin
__________________________________________________
Dr Gavin E Jarvis MA PhD VetMB MRCVS
University Lecturer
Department of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience
Physiological Laboratory
Downing Street
Cambridge
CB2 3EG
Tel: +44 (0) 1223 333745
Email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]