RE: capecitabine PopPK

From: Erik Olofsen Date: December 15, 2012 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Markus, ID=10 is perhaps causing some trouble, leading to large omega^2, and perhaps bias. How does the model work when you leave ID=10 out, at least temporarily, and with FOCE? Best regards, Erik
Quoted reply history
________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of markus joerger [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 9:24 AM To: NONMEM Subject: [NMusers] capecitabine PopPK dear NMUSERS, I am presently working on a capecitabine model (n=12, increasing levels of liver dysfunction, 3 with additional renal dysfunction). While the model works in FO, early capecitabine-concentration estimates are too low, and this does not improve with adding a peripheral compartment for capecitabine. May some of the esteemed readers suggest how to improve the model for the parent compound's early time-points? thanks so much and best regards! -- Markus Joerger MD-PhD Department of Medical Oncology&Hematology Clinical Trial Unit Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen Switzerland [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: +41-765591070 Fax: +41-714946325
Dec 15, 2012 Erik Olofsen RE: capecitabine PopPK
Dec 15, 2012 Leonid Gibiansky Re: capecitabine PopPK