Re: Output EPS(1) after an $EST step?

From: Leonid Gibiansky Date: February 03, 2012 technical Source: mail-archive.com
The only way that I know is to use SD=SQRT(IPRED**2*THETA(10)**2+THETA(11)**2) Y=IPRED+SD*EPS(1) RES=DV-IPRED IWRES = RES/SD ; same as EPS(1) $SIGMA 1 FIX Leonid -------------------------------------- Leonid Gibiansky, Ph.D. President, QuantPharm LLC web: www.quantpharm.com e-mail: LGibiansky at quantpharm.com tel: (301) 767 5566
Quoted reply history
On 2/3/2012 3:21 PM, Dodds, Mike wrote: > All, > > Is there a way to recover epsilons after an $EST step? The difference > between DV and IPRED is epsilon for a simple additive error model. > However, with a mixed proportional and additive error model, I can’t see > a way to separate the two epsilon contributions to DV-IPRED. > > $TABLE EPS(1) after an $EST step provides a column of zeros, and the > NONMEM manual indicates this is the expected behavior. > > Warm Regards, > > Mike Dodds
Feb 03, 2012 Mike Dodds Output EPS(1) after an $EST step?
Feb 03, 2012 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Output EPS(1) after an $EST step?
Feb 03, 2012 Mats Karlsson RE: Output EPS(1) after an $EST step?