202 Fortran Syntax of wings for NM7

Dear All, I have exact same NONMEM code run in two command windows, NM7 and wings for NM7. The NONMEM run is successful in the NM7 but cannot start in wings for NM7. Below is the error message. AN ERROR WAS FOUND IN THE CONTROL STATEMENTS. AN ERROR WAS FOUND ON LINE 25 AT THE APPROXIMATE POSITION NOTED: MU_1 =THETA(12) LOG(THETA(1)) X THE CHARACTERS IN ERROR ARE: LOG 202 FORTRAN SYNTAX IS INCORRECT OR INAPPROPRIATE IN THIS CONTEXT. Error in NM-TRAN_Execution with ...... After several tests, I realized that it may be due to the setting of wings for NM7, such as parameter size. In my model, I have 12 THETAS, 10 ETAS and 3 SIGMA. If I delete THETA(12) , everything is working. We have NONMEM 7.1.0 and Wings for Nonmem version 703 installed with their default setting. Can anyone help me to handle this problem? Is this due to the size of parameter? How to increase the parameter size of wings for NM7. Here is my NONMEM code: $PROB $DATA $INPUT $SUBROUTINE ADVAN6 TOL=9 $MODEL NCOMP=5 COMP=(GI,DEFDOSE) ;COMPARTMENT 1 DEPOSIT IN GI TRACT COMP=(CENTER) ;COMPARTMENT 2 FOR CENTER COMPARTMENT COMP=(PERI) ;COMPARTMENT 3 FOR PERIPHERAL COMPARTMENT COMP=(MET) ;COMPARTMENT 4 FOR METABOLITE CENTER COMPARTMENT COMP=(FREE) ;COMPARTMENT 5 FOR FREE UNBOUND COMPARTMENT $PK IF (CNIT.EQ.1.OR.CNIT.EQ.3.OR.CNIT.EQ.-1) CSP=1 IF (CNIT.EQ.2.OR.CNIT.EQ.4) CSP=0 IF (ALB.NE.-1) NALB=ALB/3.4 IF (ALB.EQ.-1) NALB=1 MU_1 = LOG(THETA(1)) ALAG1 = EXP(MU_1+ETA(1)) MU_2 = LOG(THETA(2)) K12 = EXP(MU_2+ETA(2)) MU_3 = LOG(THETA(3))+0.75*LOG(BW/70) Q = EXP(MU_3+ETA(3)) MU_4 = LOG(THETA(4))-0.25*LOG(BW/70)+THETA(12)*LOG(NALB) K24 = EXP(MU_4+ETA(4)) MU_5 = LOG(THETA(5))-0.25*LOG(BW/70) K40 = EXP(MU_5+ETA(5)) MU_6 = LOG(THETA(6))+CSP*LOG(THETA(11)) K41 = (EXP(MU_6+ETA(6))) MU_7 = LOG(THETA(7)) + LOG(BW/70) V2 = EXP(MU_7+ETA(7)) MU_8 = LOG(THETA(8)) + LOG(BW/70) V3 = EXP(MU_8+ETA(8)) MU_9 = LOG(THETA(9)) + LOG(BW/70) V4 = EXP(MU_9+ETA(9)) MU_10 = LOG(THETA(10)) FR = EXP(MU_10+ETA(10)) K23 = Q/V2 K32 = Q/V3 S2 = V2 S4 = V4 S5 = V2 $DES DADT(1) = -K12*A(1)+K41*A(4) DADT(2) = K12*A(1)+K32*A(3)-(K23+K24)*A(2) DADT(3) = K23*A(2)-K32*A(3) DADT(4) = K24*A(2)-(K41+K40)*A(4) DADT(5) = FR*(K12*A(1)+K32*A(3)-(K23+K24)*A(2)) $ERROR (ONLY OBSERVATIONS) $EST METHOD=ITS NITER=50 PRINT=5 NSIG=3 SIGL=9 $EST METHOD=IMP NITER=500 ISAMPLE=1000 PRINT=1 NOABORT CTYPE=3 CITER=10 CALPHA=0.05 $THETA $OMEGA $SIGMA Thanks for your help, -- Hong Li, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Associate Department of Pharmaceutical Science University at Buffalo, SUNY 363 Hochstetter Hall Buffalo, NY 14260 Tel#: (716)645-4827