RE: NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over study design

From: Ishidaysm Date: March 16, 2011 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Xipei I recommend you use EVID=4 at time=0 in the 2nd period on the dataset. Also you consider the relative BA(F1 parameter). ID TIME AMT DV EVID DRUG 1 0 100 . 1 1 1 0.3 . 0.7 0 1 1 0.5 . 2 0 1 .... 1 48 . 0.6 0 1 1 0 100 . 4 2 1 0.3 . 0.3 0 2 1 0.5 . 1.6 0 2 $PK KA=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1)) CL=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) V=THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3)) F1=1 IF (DRUG.EQ.2) THEN KA=THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4)) CL=THETA(5)*EXP(ETA(5)) V=THETA(6)*EXP(ETA(6)) F1=THETA(7) *EXP(ETA(7)); Relative BA parameter ENDIF Thanks! Yoshi
Quoted reply history
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of wangxipei Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:51 PM To: nmusers Subject: [NMusers] NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over study design Dear NONMEM users, I have a data set from a bioavailablity study (2×2 study design). 18 people took a single dose of a marketed drug (marked as R), then after a wash-out period, took a single dose the corresponding generic drug (marked T). I want to estimate the PK parameters of T and R seperately. One approach we handle the dataset is to consider the 18 people as 36 people. Is it right? I still want to handle them as 18 people. I read something useful in the NONMEM guides on EVID, but still comfused about the data file structure and the NONMEM codes. Thank you very much ahead for any comments. Xipei Wang Beijing, China Part of my codes and data are as below: data set: ID TIME AMT DV EVID DRUG 1 0 100 . 1 1 1 0.3 . 0.7 0 1 1 0.5 . 2 0 1 .... 1 48 . 0.6 0 1 1 0 . . 3 . 1 0 100 . 1 2 1 0.3 . 0.3 0 2 1 0.5 . 1.6 0 2 .... NONMEM CODES: $INPUT ID TIME AMT DV EVID DRUG $DATA sample.csv $SUBROUTINES ADVAN2 TRANS2 $PK KA=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1)) CL=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) V=THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3)) IF (DRUG.EQ.2) THEN KA=THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4)) CL=THETA(5)*EXP(ETA(5)) V=THETA(6)*EXP(ETA(6)) ENDIF S2=V/1000 $ERROR Y=F+ERR(1) $THETA (0, 2) ;KA (0, 8) ;CL (0, 4) ;V (0, 2) ; (0, 8) ; (0, 4) ; $OMEGA 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 $SIGMA 0.04 $ESTIMATION MAXEVAL=9999 METHOD=1
Mar 16, 2011 Wangxipei NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over study design
Mar 16, 2011 Ishidaysm RE: NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over study design
Mar 16, 2011 임동석 RE: NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over study design