RE: Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP

From: Thomas Ludden Date: September 13, 2010 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Bob: I have not found a test problem with an OMEGA BLOCK greater than 8. The largest I found was for 8 but I am still looking. However, this control stream will definitely not run but I do not think the problem is with the size of the block. The zero off-diagonal elements in the last row should terminate the run. Also, I believe the correlations for the rest of the matrix are all 1 and this could also be problematic. The user may not have looked through the rest of the file. I think the entire output (.res) file as well as the cs and data file if possible should be requested. Tom
Quoted reply history
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dieter Menne Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:41 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Bauer, Robert Subject: RE: [NMusers] Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP Robert, when trying your suggestion of using full omega instead of a band, I got the message below with the standard compiled nm7.1.2. Is there anything I can do? 0OMEGA HAS BLOCK FORM: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0DEFAULT OMEGA BOUNDARY TEST OMITTED: NO 0SIGMA HAS SIMPLE DIAGONAL FORM WITH DIMENSION: 2 0DEFAULT SIGMA BOUNDARY TEST OMITTED: NO 0INITIAL ESTIMATE OF THETA: 0.1000E-01 0.6000E+01 0.8500E+02 0.1399E+01 0.5500E+00 0.2299E+01 0.1300E+00 0.4200E+02 0.9600E-01 0.3600E+02 0.4000E+01 0.6799E+01 0.6099E+01 0.1600E+02 0.1500E+01 0.4600E+05 0.6899E+00 0.6100E+02 0.1000E+02 -0.2000E-01 0INITIAL ESTIMATE OF OMEGA: BLOCK SET NO. BLOCK FIXED 1 NO DIMENSION OF BLOCK EXCEEDS 8 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bauer, Robert Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:13 PM To: Steingötter Andreas; nmusers Subject: RE: [NMusers] Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP Andreas: The IMP/IMPMAP method of standard error assessment for OMEGA band matrices may be less reliable. I am presently investigating if there is a bug pertaining to it, and if so, I shall have it fixed for the next version. Meanwhile, Monte Carlo EM methods do quite well with full OMEGA matrices, so you may wish to repeat the SAEM/IMP method with full OMEGA. Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D. Vice President, Pharmacometrics ICON Development Solutions Tel: (215) 616-6428 Mob: (925) 286-0769 Email: [email protected] Web: www.icondevsolutions.com
Sep 07, 2010 Andreas Steingötter Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP
Sep 07, 2010 Robert Bauer RE: Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP
Sep 13, 2010 Dieter Menne RE: Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP
Sep 13, 2010 Thomas Ludden RE: Differences in Covariance analysis between FOCE vs. IMPMAP