RE: a question about the mixture distribution

From: Matt Fidler Date: October 13, 2009 technical Source: cognigen.com
Kehua, Option 1 is definitely better. This states that there is a possibility that a population falls into ALPH1 or ALPH2. Within that same population there are two populations for BASE. The other option states that each person in the has distinct parameters that four populations fall into: ALPH - Pop1, ALPH - Pop 2, Base -Pop 1, or Base -Pop2. Therefore, if you selected ALPH - pop1, you wouldn't have the parameter base. (You require this by having P1 - P4 to add up to be one - the total probability). A third option you may consider is if you have reason to believe that the populations that have ALPH1 and Base1 are the same: $PRED IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN ALPH =THETA(1) ELSE ALPH = THETA(2) ENDIF IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN BASE=THETA(3) ELSE BASE=THETA(4) END IF $MIX P(1) = THETA(5) P(2) = 1-THETA(5) NSPOP = 2 I haven't run anything like Option 1, and am unsure if NONMEM supports two separate populations for ALPH and BASE. Has anyone tried this? Matt.
Quoted reply history
________________________________ From: owner-nmusers On Behalf Of wu kehua Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:58 AM To: nmusers Subject: [NMusers] a question about the mixture distribution Hi, I am a new NONMEM user. I have a question about mixture distribution. I have two parameters. How to apply mixture distribution on the both parameters? I should use the first one or the second one? First, $PRED IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN ALPH =THETA(1) END IF IF (MIXNUM.EQ.1) THEN ALPH = THETA(2) ENDIF IF (MIXNUM.EQ.3) THEN BASE=THETA(3) ELSE BASE=THETA(4) END IF $MIX P(1) = THETA(5) P(2) = 1-THETA(5) P(3)=THETA(6) P(4)=1-THETA6) NSPOP = 4 Second, IF (MIXNUM.EQ.1) THEN ALPH =THETA(1) BASE=THETA(3) END IF IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN ALPH = THETA(1) BASE=THETA(4) ENDIF IF (MIXNUM.EQ.3) THEN ALPH = THETA(2) BASE=THETA(3) ELSE ALPH = THETA(2) BASE=THETA(4) END IF $MIX P(1) = THETA(5) P(2) = THETA(6) P(3)=THETA(7) P(4)=1-THETA(5)-THETA(6)-THETA(7) NSPOP = 4 Thank you very much! Best regards, Kehua This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
Oct 13, 2009 wu Kehua a question about the mixture distribution
Oct 13, 2009 Matt Fidler RE: a question about the mixture distribution
Oct 13, 2009 Matt Fidler RE: a question about the mixture distribution
Oct 20, 2009 Joseph Standing RE: a question about the mixture distribution
Nov 17, 2009 wu Kehua Re: a question about the mixture distribution