Re: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes

From: Nick Holford Date: July 22, 2009 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Steve, I've been hearing about copulas for a couple of years now but haven't seen anything which reveals how they can be translated into the real world. If we take the example I gave of hospitalization for heart disease and death as being two 'correlated' events. Is there something like a correlation coefficient that you can get from a copula to describe the assocation between the two event time distributions? If one then added a fixed effect, such as cholesterol in the example I proposed, would you then see a fall in this correlation coefficient? It would be helpful to me and perhaps to others if you could give some specific example of what copulas contribute. Nick Stephen Duffull wrote: > Anthony We've been working with extreme value Copula functions for conjoining survival analyses in MATLAB. I wasn't sure, however, whether these could be implemented easily in NONMEM. > > Steve > > > -----Original Message-----
Quoted reply history
> > From: A.J. Rossini [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 5:31 p.m. > > To: Stephen Duffull > > Cc: Nick Holford; nmusers > > Subject: Re: [NMusers] Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes > > > > For 2 event-time responses, without regression, copula models are the > > common way of handling bivariate event time models. There are some > > extensions for regression approaches with them, but I havn't been > > following that literature. > > > > Another approach would be the Weissfield-Wei-Lin (not sure I got the > > first name correct) extensions to the cox model, but that is more like > > the GEE/Population average approach, which handles and accomodates the > > correlation structure indirectly rather than being specific about it > > as in the mixed-effects literature. > > > > The above are implemented in R, along with many variations. Check > > CRAN. > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Stephen > > Duffull<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Nick > > > > > > Your approach is an important first step. However, there remains the > > > > possibility of co-dependence in the marginal distribution of the data > > once you have included a common fixed effect in your models. > > > > > I'm not sure that this can be specifically implemented in NONMEM for > > > > odd-type data. If it can then I'm keen to learn more. > > > > > Steve > > > -- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:owner- > > > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Holford > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 8:08 a.m. > > > > To: nmusers > > > > Subject: Re: [NMusers] Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes > > > > > > > > Manisha, > > > > > > > > It might be helpful if you could be more specific about what you > > > > mean > > > > > > by > > > > correlated event times e.g. one could image that the time to event > > > > for > > > > > > hospitalization for a heart attack and the time to event for death > > > > might > > > > be correlated because they both depend on the the status of > > > > atherosclerotic heart disease. > > > > > > > > A parametric approach would be to specify the hazards for the two > > > > events > > > > and include a common covariate (e.g. serum cholesterol time course, > > > > chol(t)) in the hazard e.g. > > > > > > > > h(hosp)=basehosp*exp(Bcholhosp*chol(t)) > > > > h(death)=basedeath*exp(Bcholdeath*chol(t)) > > > > > > > > The common covariate, chol(t), would introduce some degree of > > > > correlation between the event times. > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > Manisha Lamba wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear NMusers, > > > > > > > > > > If anyone in the user group aware of approaches on developing > > > > > semi-parametric or parametric models for (joint modeling of) two > > > > > time-to-event endpoints, which are highly correlated? > > > > > Any suggestions/references/codes(NONMEM, R etc.) would be very > > > > much > > > > > > > appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks! > > > > > Manisha > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Nick Holford, Professor Clinical Pharmacology > > > > Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology > > > > University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New > > > > Zealand > > > > [email protected] tel:+64(9)923-6730 fax:+64(9)373-7090 > > > > mobile: +33 64 271-6369 (Apr 6-Jul 20 2009) > > > > http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/sms/pharmacology/holford > > > > -- > > best, > > -tony > > > > [email protected] > > Muttenz, Switzerland. > > "Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we > > can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05). > > > > Drink Coffee: Do stupid things faster with more energy! -- Nick Holford, Professor Clinical Pharmacology Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] tel:+64(9)923-6730 fax:+64(9)373-7090 mobile: +33 64 271-6369 (Apr 6-Jul 20 2009) http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/sms/pharmacology/holford
Jul 21, 2009 Manisha Lamba Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 21, 2009 Nick Holford Re: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 21, 2009 Stephen Duffull RE: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 22, 2009 Stephen Duffull RE: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 22, 2009 Anthony J. Rossini Re: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 22, 2009 Nick Holford Re: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 23, 2009 Stephen Duffull RE: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 23, 2009 Nick Holford Re: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 24, 2009 Nick Holford Re: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 24, 2009 Mats Karlsson RE: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes
Jul 24, 2009 Stephen Duffull RE: Modeling of two time-to-event outcomes