Quantitative criteria for the use of interoccasional variability (IOV) ?

From: Kyun-seop Bae Date: October 23, 2008 technical Source: mail-archive.com

Hi, Objective function value (OFV, MVO) decreased by 10 from 6000 when interoccasional variability (IOV) for three occasions is used. Standard errors decreased a little bit, but I cannot notice improvements of diagnostic plots. Some use 3.84 criteria (a value from chi-square distribution) for one additional parameter. I think additional OMEGA SAME for IOV should be handled differently from theta, omega or sigma. (Though I don't like the above criteria using chi-square distribution,) I would like to know if there is similar quantitative criteria for IOV. Thanks, Kyun-Seop Bae

Oct 23, 2008	Kyun-seop Bae	Quantitative criteria for the use of interoccasional variability (IOV) ?
Oct 23, 2008	Nick Holford	Re: Quantitative criteria for the use of interoccasional variability (IOV) ?

`j` / `k`	Next / previous message
`o`	Open message
`f`	Search
`s`	Copy link
`t`	Filters
`c`	Copy message body
`r`	Related threads
`?`	This help
`Esc`	Close / clear

Quantitative criteria for the use of interoccasional variability (IOV) ?

Thread

Keyboard Shortcuts