RE: NONMEM and g77

From: William Bachman Date: September 02, 2008 technical Source: mail-archive.com
I tend to agree with Darin. We have had relatively few issues with g77. We have had problems with some versions of g95. Basically some worked, some did not.
Quoted reply history
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Perusich Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NMusers] NONMEM and g77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Any other users out there who are happy with gfortran as substitute for > g77 as compiler? > gfortran releases after version 4.1 are not compatible with NONMEM because it is a Fortran 95 compiler and NONMEM is written to conform with the Fortran 77 standard. The gfortran developers claim that "most" Fortran 77 code "should" work with minimal or no code modifications but this didn't prove to be the case. I tried getting NONMEM to build with gfortran 4.2.x for the better part of a day using a myriad of compatibility options but it was to no avail, at which point I switched to GNU Fortran g77 3.3.5 and have had no issues what so ever. If anyone has had success building NONMEM with recent releases gfortran I'd be very interested in knowing which version and the options used. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug 26, 2008 Justin Wilkins NONMEM and g77
Aug 26, 2008 Justin . Wilkins NONMEM and g77
Aug 27, 2008 Michael Karol RE: NONMEM and g77
Sep 01, 2008 Joachim Grevel Re: NONMEM and g77
Sep 01, 2008 Joachim . Grevel Re: NONMEM and g77
Sep 01, 2008 Destree Maud FW: NONMEM and g77
Sep 02, 2008 Darin Perusich Re: NONMEM and g77
Sep 02, 2008 William Bachman RE: NONMEM and g77