RE: Any solutions to both "minimization terminated" and "high" relative bioavailability

From: Mark Sale Date: August 21, 2008 technical Source: cognigen.com
Hong-Guang Analyses across so many studies are notoriously difficult, especially with different routes of administration. My personal experience is that the most common cause for this sort of thing is errors in the data set. Make sure that the dose and concentration units are the same for all studies, as well as weight, height etc. If the populations are (relatively) the same across the studies, and the drug is the same (same formulation), and one study isn't with ketoconazole (or other inhibitor/inducer), the error is almost certainly in the data set. Again, in my experience, additional doses are a frequent source of error. Also check that you are administering the drug in the correct compartment. I assume that the dose for the iv is going into compartment 2 for ADVAN4? All observtions are compartment 2? (You'll need to specifiy the compartment the dose and observation goes into for this model, since, I think you'll have doses going into comp 1 and 2, extravascular and iv) I have a few plots that I like to make: -Cumulative dose for each person vs time -Histogram of interdose intervals (this will pick up a common one for me, where I give one too many additional doses - you'll have an interdose interval of 0, two doses given at the same time). -Histogram of interval between observation and most recent dose. Mark Sale MD Next Level Solutions, LLC www.NextLevelSolns.com 919-846-9185
Quoted reply history
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NMusers] Any solutions to both "minimization terminated" and "high" relative bioavailability From: Hong-Guang Xie <hongg.xie Date: Thu, August 21, 2008 2:30 pm To: nmusers Dear NONMEM Users, Recently I combined six popPK studies (STDY) together as a whole and tried to re-estimate the pop PK parameters of that drug in the population with a wide range of the age and body weight. In the pooled dataset, all subjects were given with a single dose of that drug. Part of the control stream was provided as follows. Based on the prior knowledge that a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination is used to describe its PK profile well, a two-compartment model was used for my meta-popPK analysis. After the NM run for the additive or proportional error model or both, the NM indicated that "MINIMIZATION TERMINATED DUT TO ROUNDING ERRORS (ERROR4)" alone or in combination with "ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS OCCURED WITH THE MINIMIZATION. REGARD THE RESULTS OF THE ESTIMATION STEP CAREFULLY, AND ACCEPT THEM ONLY AFTER CHECKING THE COVARIANCE STEP PRODUCES REASONABLE OUTPUT". In addition, the typical values of the relative bioavailability (F1) was estimated as 5 - 8 for STDY 3 (that is, f13), 9 -14 for STDY 5 (or f15) and 0.4 - 0.53 for STDY 6 (f16). Obviously, only f16 seems to be reasonable. The drug used in the STDY 3 and 5 was given extravascularly, and thus their F1 values should be less than 1. To fix these problems, I have made many efforts but failed. For this, I would appreciate your time and suggestions. Thank you, Hong-Guang Xie <div>========= ............ $SUBROUTINE ADVAN4 TRANS4 $PK ETAMX = 10 SI1=0 SI2=0 ; SI3=0 SI4=0 SI5=0   SI6=0 IF (STDY .EQ. 1) SI1=1 ; iv IF (STDY .EQ. 2) SI2=1   ; iv IF (STDY .EQ. 3) SI3=1 ; epidural IF (STDY .EQ. 4) SI4=1 ; iv   IF (STDY .EQ. 5) SI5=1 ; rectal   IF (STDY .EQ. 6) SI6=1 ; oral   IV = SI1+SI2+SI4 ;intravascular dosing ;APPARENT CLEARANCE TVCL=popcl PPVCL=bsvcl IF (ABS(PPVCL) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 10 CL=TVCL*EXP(PPVCL) ;CENTRAL VOLUME OF DISTRIBUTION TVV2=popv2 PPVV2=bsvv2 IF (ABS(PPVV2) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 20 V2=TVV2*EXP(PPVV2) ;INTERCOMPARTMENTAL CLEARANCE TVQ=popq PPVQ=bsvq IF (ABS(PPVQ) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 30   Q=TVQ*EXP(PPVQ) ;PERIPHERAL VOLUME OF DISTRIBUTION   TVV3=popv3 PPVV3=bsvv3 IF (ABS(PPVV3) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 40 V3=TVV3*EXP(PPVV3) ;FIRST ORDER ABSORPTION RATE CONSTANT   TVKA=SI3*ka3+SI5*ka5+SI6*ka6 PPVKA=bsvka IF (ABS(PPVKA) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 50 KA=TVKA*EXP(PPVKA) ;LAG TIME   TVLAG=SI3*lag3+SI5*lag5+SI6*lag6 PPVLAG=bsvlag IF (ABS(PPVLAG) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 60 ALAG1=TVLAG*EXP(PPVLAG) ;BIOAVAILABILITY (BA) TVF1=SI3*f13+SI5*f15+SI6*f16 ; PPVF1=bsvf1 IF (ABS(PPVF1) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 70 BA=TVF1*EXP(PPVF1) IF (IV .GE. 1) THEN   F1=1 ELSE   F1 ENDIF ;ZERO ORDER ABSORPTION DURATION TVD2=SI1*d21+SI2*d22+SI4*d24   PPVD2=bsvd2 IF (ABS(PPVD2) .GE. ETAMX) EXIT 1 80 D2=TVD2*EXP(PPVD2) ; RMIN=AMT/(60*D2) ;mcg/minute ; SCALING FOR CENTRAL COMPARTMENT (I.E., CONCENTRATION COMPARTMENT)   S2=V2 ; DOSE IN MCG, CONCENTRATION IN NG/ML=MCG/L $ERROR IPRED = F IF (MDV .EQ. 0) THEN   W = SQRT(add**2 + F*F*prop**2) ; ELSE W = 1 ; ENDIF IRES=DV-IPRED   IF (W .EQ. 0) THEN IWRES=IRES ELSE   IWRES=IRES/W ENDIF   Y=F+W*eps1*EXP(bsvres) $THETA (0,11.5)   ;popcl (0,24.1) ; ;popv2   (0,12.9) ;popq (0,8.22) ;popv3   (0,0.14) ;ka3   (0,0.109)   ;ka5 (0,0.397) ;ka6   (0 FIX)   ;lag3   (0 FIX)   ;lag5   (0 FIX)   ;lag6 (0,4.93) ;f13 (0,9.19)   ;f15 (0,0.523)   ;f16 (0,0.00072) ;d21 ;(0,0.00007) ;d22 (0,0.00003) ;d24 (0, 0.01) ;add   (0, 0.05) ;prop $OMEGA 0.828 ;bsvcl $OMEGA 1.63 ;bsvv2$OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvq $OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvv3 $OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvka $OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvlag $OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvf1 $OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvd2 $OMEGA 0 FIX ;bsvres $SIGMA 1. FIX ; eps1 $ESTIMATION NOABORT MAXEVAL99 POSTHOC PRINT=5 SIGDIGITS=3 MSFO   METHOD=CONDITIONAL INTERACTION ;$COV PRINT=E $TABLE ID STDY TIME DV IPRED AMT MDV CMT CL V2 Q V3 KA ALAG1 F1 D2 RATE RMIN ETA1 ETA2 ETA3 ETA4 ETA5 ETA6 ETA7 ETA8 ETA9 IWRES IRES WT BWT AGEY AGED GAGE NOPRINT ONEHEADER FILE= ======== ============= ============= ========= (image/png attachment: left.letterhead)