Re: Weibull distribution

From: Nick Holford Date: April 11, 2007 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Steve makes a good point. You should be using the special variable T in $DES not TIME. T is the instantaneous value of time used by the DE solver. TIME is the time of the current record which the DE solver is attempting to move towards to find a solution. Try this for DADT(1): DADT(1)=-A(1)*(BETA/ALPHA)*((T/ALPHA)**(BETA-1))*EXP(-(T/ALPHA)**BETA) Nick Steve Troy wrote: > > Dear Abduljalil, > > I am not an expert on using the Weibull distribution for drug > absorption, but I suspect that the value of TIME in the equation for > DADT(1) should represent the elapsed time since the most recent dose. > For example, if dosing occurs at 0, 24, and 48 hours, then the > observation at 25 hours after the start of the study (ie, 1 hour after > the most recent dose) should use TIME=1 hour in the equation for > DADT(1). However, I suspect that TIME=25 hours is being used in the > current problem. > > Good luck, > > Steve >
Quoted reply history
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Khaled Mohammed Abduljalil > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [NMusers] Weibull distribution > > Dear NONMEM users, > > I have tried to study the pk profiles of a drug after > multiple oral dosage regimen of 500mg every 12hr. The > estimation process was well performed with the first dose > (only) using Weibull function. but if i apply the same > control file to the whole data (ie, single dose and > multiple doses), it does not work any more. I can not > detect my error. Could any one tell me where is it? > neither first order nor Mich.-Menten models fitted the > data like weibull model. > > thank you very much in advance for your response. > > sincerely yours > Abduljalil > > $SUBROUTINES ADVAN6 TRANS1 TOL=3 > $MODEL > COMP=(DEPOT,DEFDOSE) > COMP=(CENTRAL,DEFOBS) > > $PK > CL=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1)) > V=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) > BETA=THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3)) > ALPHA=THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4)) > > K=CL/V > > S1=1 > S2=V > > $ERROR > DEL=0 > IF(F.EQ.0) DEL=0.001 > W=F > IPRED=F > IRES=DV-IPRED > IWRES=IRES/(W+DEL) > Y=F+EPS(1) > > $DES > DADT(1)=-A(1)*(BETA/ALPHA)*((TIME/ALPHA)**(BETA-1))*EXP(-(TIME/ALPHA)**B > ETA) > DADT(2)=-DADT(1)-A(2)*K > > $THETA > (0.01,17,80); > (10,115,900); > (0.1,2.2,30) > (0.1,2.6,30) > (0.001,2) > (0.001,1) > > $OMEGA > 0.1 0.2 0.08 0.2 > > $SIGMA > 0.2 > > $EST METHOD=1 INTER PRINT=5 NOABORT MAXEVAL=9999 > ************************************************************ > The contents of this message are intended only for the use > of the individual to which they are addressed and may > contain confidential or privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any use, distribution, disclosure or copying of this > message, any attachment or the information contained > therein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > transmission in error, please notify the original sender > immediately and delete all copies of this message, along > with any attachments. Thank you. > ************************************************************ -- Nick Holford, Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+64(9)373-7599x86730 fax:373-7556 http://www.health.auckland.ac.nz/pharmacology/staff/nholford/
Apr 11, 2007 Khaled Mohammed Abduljalil Weibull distribution
Apr 11, 2007 Steve Troy RE: Weibull distribution
Apr 11, 2007 Nick Holford Re: Weibull distribution