problem with simulation

From: Kai wu Date: November 30, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "kai wu" Subject: [NMusers] problem with simulation Date: Tue, November 30, 2004 11:52 am Dear users, I am doing a pk-pd simulation with indirect response model to see the inhibition in two PD compartment. I set up three occasions, for two different doses and baseline respectively. PK follow 2-comp, and the inhibiton will be quantified as AUC in 24 hrs. After simulation I found there is something wrong with the simulated concentrations in the second PD compartment. The baseline AUC is actually much lower than the AUC after dosing, and the starting steady concentration(at 24hr) at baseline is much lower than the other two dosing occations. The model used in this simulation was also tried by "SCIENTIST" for single subject and the results were right as supposed. So I am hoping someone can point out where I am doing wrong in this NONMEM simulation. The basic code is as followings: $PROBLEM PKPD $INPUT ID TIME AMT DV CMT EVID OCC $DATA ALL1.CSV IGNORE=# $SUBROUTINES ADVAN6 TRANS1 TOL=5 $MODEL COMP=(! DEPOT) ;1 COMP=(CENTRAL) ;2 COMP=(PERIPH) ;3 COMP=(CORT);4 COM=(LYM);5 $ABBREVIATED DERIV2=NO $PK ... RRBE=935 RRBC=7.8 IF (OCC.EQ.3) RRBC=935 ... $DES DADT(1)=-KA*A(1) DADT(2)=KA*A(1)-K10*A(2) CP=A(2)/S2 EFFC=1-CP*0.12/(EC50+CP*0.12) DADT(3)=RCORT*EFFC-KE*A(3) Cort=A(3)/S3 KTC=30000000 KALB=5000 QTC=0.0000007 QALB=0.00055 MW=362.47*(10**6) CortM=Cort/MW B1=KTC*QTC+KALB*QALB+1-CortM*KTC A1=KALB*QALB*KTC+KTC CORTFM=(-B1+SQRT(B1**2+4*A1*CortM))/(2*A1) Cortf=CORTFM*MW UPP=CP*0.12+Cortf*RRBC/RRBE DOW=EC50CL+CP*0.12+Cortf*RRBC/RRBE EFFL=1-UPP/DOW DADT(4)=KIN*EFFL-KOUT*A(4) ... $SIGMA (0 FIXED) (0 FIXED) (0 FIXED) ... And the data file is basically set up as #ID TIME AMT DV CMT EVID OCC 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 1 1 24 1000 1 1 1 1 24 0 2 0 1 1 24 0 4 0 1 1 24 0 5 0 1 Thanks in advance! Kai Wu Department of Pharmaceutics University of Florida Gainesville, Fl Office phone #: 352-846-2730
Nov 30, 2004 Kai wu problem with simulation
Nov 30, 2004 Nick Holford RE: problem with simulation
Nov 30, 2004 Kai wu RE: problem with simulation