RE: Portland Group f77 compiler

From: William Bachman Date: August 06, 2002 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Bachman, William" Subject:RE: [NMusers] Portland Group f77 compiler Date:Tue, 6 Aug 2002 09:03:17 -0400 Nick, You can't just leave it at that. What evidence do you have to support this claim: "I know from testing under Windows that the Compaq Visual Fortran compiler (v 6.6A) appears to be numerically more robust than g77." My experience has been to the contrary, the g77 compiler (with -O optimization) behaved better with respect to floating point runtime errors than the Compaq/Digital (with "/optimize:1 /fpe:0" optimization" which has been used widely as the default). The results produced have been consistant with output produced on UNIX systems using either g77 or Sun's compiler. (A "better" (more robust) set of optimization options for Compaq/Digital seems to be "/optimize:4 /fltconsistency /fpe:3" with respect to floating point operations.) regards, Bill
Aug 06, 2002 Nick Holford Portland Group f77 compiler
Aug 06, 2002 William Bachman RE: Portland Group f77 compiler
Aug 06, 2002 Nick Holford Compaq Visual Fortran compared to Gnu g77 compiler
Aug 06, 2002 Larry Bauer Re: Portland Group f77 compiler