RE: Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6

From: Thomas Ludden Date: March 20, 2002 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Ludden, Thomas" Subject: RE: [NMusers] Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:27:34 -0500 Nick has confirmed that the WIDE option on the $DATA record prevents the data truncation that he has observed. Please see the documentation for this option under $DATA in Guide VIII for additional details. Tom Ludden
Quoted reply history
-----Original Message----- From: Nick Holford [mailto:n.holford@auckland.ac.nz] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:26 PM To: Bachman, William Subject: Re: try the WIDE option to see if it prevents the truncation. Bill, The WIDE option does indeed prevent the truncation. But its still an NM-TRAN bug when the default NOWIDE option is used :-( Nick
Mar 19, 2002 Paul Hutson Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6 and NM-TRAN Bug
Mar 20, 2002 Nick Holford Re: Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6
Mar 20, 2002 Thomas Ludden RE: Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6
Mar 20, 2002 Sam Liao RE: Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6
Mar 20, 2002 Atul Bhattaram Venkatesh Re: Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs 6.6
Mar 21, 2002 Diane Mould RE: Digital Visual Fortran vers 5.0 vs. 6.6