RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000

From: Vladimir Piotrovskij Date: May 07, 2001 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Piotrovskij, Vladimir [JanBe]" <VPIOTROV@janbe.jnj.com> Subject: RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000 Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 10:16:20 +0200 Joern, I don't think you need low priority for NONMEM to do parallel tasks under Win2000. I am using a single-processor machine, too, and running NONMEM in parallel with, say, text processing (Word) or graphical exploration (S+) without problems. The only complication I observed until now was that I had to run S+ before executing NONMEM job. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vladimir Piotrovsky, Ph.D. Research Fellow Global Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacology (ext. 5463) Janssen Research Foundation B-2340 Beerse Belgium Email: vpiotrov@janbe.jnj.com
May 04, 2001 Joern Loetsch NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 07, 2001 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 07, 2001 Mark Sale RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 07, 2001 Nick Holford Re: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 08, 2001 Ludger Banken RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 08, 2001 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 08, 2001 Ludger Banken RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 08, 2001 Mark Sale RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 08, 2001 William Bachman RE: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000
May 08, 2001 Nick Holford Re: NONMEM priority on windows NT/2000