RE: Error (72)

From: "Piotrovskij, Vladimir [JanBe]" <VPIOTROV@janbe.jnj.com> Subject: RE: Error (72) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:24:31 +0100 Dear Rebecca, You should be more specific when posting your questions. The convergence behaviour of NONMEM depends very much on the METHOD you select for $EST. It can be totally different for METHOD=0 (the default first order linearization method) and for METHOD=1 (first-order conditional method). It would be better if you attach the entire NM-TRAN control. The way you implement the fixed effect of WT is not optimal. Firstly, it is preferable to center it using median WT (say, 70) as offset. Then, it worth to include an intercept in the fixed effect model, e.g.: TVCL=THETA(1)+THETA(2)*(WT-70). THETA(1) corresponds to the typical clearance at median WT. Lastly, I would strongly recommend to avoid using TRANS3. You will have much less troubles with TRANS4. Hope this helps, Vladimir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Vladimir Piotrovsky, Ph.D. Janssen Research Foundation Clinical Pharmacokinetics B-2340 Beerse Belgium Email: vpiotrov@janbe.jnj.com ************************** These postings lead to a quite lengthy thread of messages under the subject heading of "Covariate Models Using Weight". Reading through the entirity of this thread revealed that the discussion progressed across four subtopics and was therefore archived as four inter-linked threads. Messages that served to transition the discussion from one subtopic to the next will appear in both subtopics. Centering Covariates Covariate Models Using Weight (Allometric Scaling) Covariate Models Using CrCL Predefined Models vs. "Context-Sensitive" Emperical Models